The application concerning water pollution in Ghaziabad was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant with liberty to file a detailed fresh application invoking suo moto jurisdiction.
Withdrawal of the present Original Application with liberty to file a fresh application with requisite details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 03
Court No. 2
BEFORE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 127/2026
Vijendra Singh Chiranjeev Applicant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Respondents
Date of hearing: 09.03.2026
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
A pplicant: Mr. Gaurav Malhotra, Advocate for the Applicant.
ORDER
in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha, (2022) 13 SCC 401.
1
liberty to file fresh Original Application with all requisite factual details constituting the cause of action with particulars of environmental violations and substantial environmental questions involved, impleading necessary parties and enclosing copies of the relevant documents.
Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
March 09th , 2026 Original Application No. 127/2026 AB
2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita SinhaReferred¶12
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha, (2022) 13 SCC 401 · Who else cites this
Vijendra Singh Chiranjeev
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Arun Kumar Tyagi
Dr. A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
