Disposed

Arvind Singh v. Union of India

NGT9 Feb 2026IA No. 652/2025 in Original Application No. 132/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Merged Original Applications regarding District Sub-Plan Reconciliation at Jhansi. Court approved impleadment of a likely affected party, granted time for affidavit and status clarification, ordered amendment of cause title, and listed for hearing.

What did the court decide?

Impleadment of applicant in I.A. 652/2025 allowed; time granted for affidavit and amendment; matter listed for hearing.

Arvind Singh vs Union of India — Environment and Pollution | NGT (2026)

¶1

Items No. 23 & 24

¶2

Court No. 1

¶3

BEFORE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

¶4

Original Application No. 132/2025 (I.A. Nos. 240/2025, 241/2025 & 652/2025)

¶5

Arvind Singh Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s)

¶8

With

¶9

Original Application No. 136/2025 (I.A. No.237/2025)

¶10

Vikram Singh Applicant

¶11

Versus

¶12

MoEF&CC & Ors. Respondent(s)

¶13

Date of hearing: 09.02.2026

¶14

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER Applicant: Mr. D.S. Parmar, Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Mr. Saurabh Singh & Ms. Ananya Sahu, Advocates for Applicant in OA 132/2025 Mr. Tanay, Adv. for Applicant in OA 136/2025 (Through VC) Respondents: Mr. V.K. Shahi, AAG with Mr. Ankit Verma, Adv. for the State of UP (Through VC) Mr. Bhanwar Pal Singh Jadon, Ms. Gargi Chauturvedi, Ms. Anjali Sharma, Mr. Shivansh Sharma & Ms. Disha Tiwari, Advs. for UPPCB Mr. Prasenjeet Mohapatra, Adv. for MoEF & CC in OA 132/2025 (Through VC) Mr. Naveen Kumar, Adv. for MoEF & CC in OA 136/2025 (Through VC) Ms. Priyanka Swami, Adv. for SEIAA, UP Mr. Panshul Chandra, Adv. in I.A. 652/2025 (Through VC)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 on instruction submits that

¶17

after the original DSR which was issued on 17.10.2024, the only supplementary DSR has been approved by the Respondent No. 2 in respect of District Jhansi on 08.01.2026.

¶18

¶19

She seeks a weeks’ time to place this status on record by way of affidavit, and also clarify if the area mentioned in the e-auction notice is covered by the original DSR.

¶20

I.A. No. 652/2025 has been filed by one of the likely affected parties for impleadment. The Counsel for the other parties do not oppose this IA. Hence, it is allowed.

¶21

Learned counsel for the newly impleaded respondent submits that the reply will be filed within one week.

¶22

Let the cause title of the OA be amended and the amended memo of

¶23

parties be filed within one week by the applicant.

¶24

List for hearing on 11.03.2026.

¶25

Prakash Shrivastava, CP

¶26

Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM

¶27

February 09, 2026 OA No. 132/2025 & OA No. 136/2025 HB.

¶28

Arvind Singh v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Singh v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sayyed Mohammed Sabir Usman vs Union of India through Secretary Moef & Cc

1. Jhadeswar Pradhan S/O Rasanand Pradhan Aged About 60YEARS vs 1. State of Odisha Represented by Chief Secretary Government of Odisha

Shri Sandeep Mishra vs State of Madhya Pradesh through Its Principal Secretary

Shri Sandeep Mishra vs State of Madhya Pradesh through Its Principal Secretary

Mamta Sharma vs Gram Sabha

Mamta Sharma vs Gram Sabha

Surjeet Singh vs the Member Secretary State Environment Impact Assessment Authority Paryavaran Parisar

Rajender vs Union of India

Misc Application in disposed of cases No. 63/2024 in Original Application No. 199/2023 of Kapil Dev vs State of Punjab through the Chief Secretary

Giriraj Parikrama Sanrakshan Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Misc Application in disposed of cases No. 6/2026 in Original Application No. 24/2016 of Giriraj Parikrama Sanrakshan Sansthan vs State of Rajasthan

Laxmi Chand vs

Dr Purva Mathur vs

Amber Sachdeva vs