National Green Tribunal Western Zone Bench dismissed a review application finding it not maintainable as there was no error apparent on the face of the impugned order, directing applicants to move a recall application if grievances existed.
Review application dismissed; liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Pune Bench)
Item No.3
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL WESTERN ZONE BENCH, PUNE
[THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION)]
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2025 (WZ)
IN MISC. APPLICATION NO.05 OF 2024 (WZ) IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2022 (WZ) IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.80 OF 2020(WZ)
Commissioner of Fisheries & Anr.
…..Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Vanashakti & Anr.
…..Applicants
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….Respondents
Date of hearing: 17.09.2025
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. VIJAY KULKARNI, EXPERT MEMBER HON’BLE DR. SUJIT KUMAR BAJPAYEE, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicants
: Mr. Akshay Jadhav, Advocate along-with Ms. Manjula Chakravarty, Advocate
ORDER
Page 1 of 2
Dinesh Kumar Singh, JM
Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, EM
Dr. Sujit Kumar Bajpayee, EM
September 17, 2025 REVIEW APPLICATION NO.03 OF 2025 (WZ) P.Kr
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review application is maintainable where no error appears on the face of the impugned order.
Vanashakti & Anr.
Commissioner of Fisheries & Anr.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Vijay Kulkarni
Sujit Kumar Bajpayee
As recorded by the court registry
An application asking a tribunal to review its own order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
