The National Green Tribunal dismissed the original application seeking strict implementation of a closure order against a brick kiln. The court held that no cause of action existed for interference as the kiln was not operating post-High Court order, but dismissed with liberty to approach the Tribunal if the closure is violated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 03
Court No. 1
BEFORE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 161/2025 (IA No 372/2025)
Sanjay Kumar Singh
Applicant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 18.11.2025
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Applicant in Person (Through VC)
ORDER
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
1
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
November 18, 2025 Original Application No. 161/2025 (IA No 372/2025) dv
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal should interfere to ensure strict implementation of the closure order against a brick kiln when no fresh cause of action is demonstrated.
Whether the impugned closure order against a brick kiln requires enforcement by the Tribunal in the absence of non-compliance.
Sanjay Kumar Singh
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
