Complaint regarding defunct RO plants in Rehta, UP, leading to a Joint Committee report. Tribunal found all 11 plants operational and piped water in trial run. Application disposed of with direction to file progress report.
Disposal of original application with direction to file progress report of Har Ghar Jal Yojna pipeline arrangement by 30.04.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.15
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No.611/2022
Panna Lal
Applicant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 05.01.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: None for the applicant. Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Misra and Mr. Daleep Dhyani Advocates for UPPCB (Through VC). Mr. Ashutosh Thakur Advocate for Respondent No. 4 NCL Kakri.
ORDER
1
the inhabitants of the village Rehta and Bansi has also been made. The report further discloses that the pipeline arrangement under Har Ghar Jal Yojna under Jal Jeevan Mission covering both the villages is in trial run.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
January 05, 2024 AG
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the grievance regarding defunct Reverse Osmosis plants has been substantially redressed.
Whether the pipeline arrangement under Har Ghar Jal Yojna addresses the villagers' water supply needs.
Panna Lal
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
Sudhir Agarwal
A. Senthil Vel
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
