News Item Titled "Ret Ka Avaidh Utkhanan Kar Parivahan Karne Walo Par Tabadtod Action Vibhag Ko Jurmane Se Hui Itne Lakh Kee Kamaee" Appearing in Khabar 36 Media Dated 04.03.2024 vs

NGT9 May 2024Original Application No. 507/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Original Application registered suo-motu based on a news report alleging illegal sand mining in Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. The Tribunal impleaded relevant environmental authorities and transferred the matter to its Central Zonal Bench at Bhopal for further action.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to respondents to file response; original application transferred to Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal.

News Item Titled "Ret Ka Avaidh Utkhanan Kar Parivahan… — Mining and Natural Resources | NGT (2024)

¶1

Item No.01

¶2

Court No. 1

¶3

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

¶4

Original Application No. 507/2024

¶5

News item titled “ रेत का अवैध उत्खनन कर पररवहन करने वाल ों पर ताबड़त ड़ एक्शन , ववभाग क जुमााने से हुई इतने लाख की कमाई ” appearing in Khabar 36 Media dated 04.03.2024

¶6

Date of hearing: 09.05.2024

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER

¶8

ORDER

¶9

This Original Application is registered suo-motu on the basis of the news item titled “ रेत का अवैध उत्खनन कर पररवहन करने वाल ों पर ताबड़त ड़

¶10

एक्शन , ववभाग क जुमााने से हुई इतने लाख की कमाई ” appearing in Khabar 36 Media dated 04.03.2024.

¶11

The matter relates to the alleged illegal mining taking place in Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. As per the article, the joint team of Mineral, Police, Environment and Revenue Department together took action on 95 cases, which yielded revenue of Rs 26 lakh, while 18 crusher mines in the district were sealed for violating environmental norms.

¶12

The above news item indicates violation of the Sand Mining Guidelines, 2016 and the provisions of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

¶13

The news item raises substantial issue relating to compliance of the environmental norms and implementation of the provisions of scheduled enactment.

¶14

¶15

Power of the Tribunal to take up the matter suo-motu has been recognized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of “Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Ankita Sinha & Ors.” reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 897 .

¶16

Hence, we implead following as respondents in this matter:

¶17

(i) Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, Raipur, through its Member Secretary, Paryavas Bhavan, North Block Sector-19, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur – 492002, Chhattisgarh

¶18

(ii) Central Pollution Control Board, through its Member Secretary, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi-110032

¶19

(iii) Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Regional Office (WCZ), Nagpur, Ground Floor, East Wing, New Secretariat Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440 001

¶20

(iv) Collector & District Magistrate, Bilaspur, Office of the Collector District – Bilaspur, Pin – 495 001

¶21

Let notice be issued to the above Respondents for filing their response before the appropriate bench of the Tribunal.

¶22

Since the matter relates to the Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal, therefore, OA is transferred to the Central Zonal Bench for appropriate further action. Office is directed to transfer the original record of the OA to Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal.

¶23

List before Central Zonal Bench at Bhopal on 12.07.2024.

¶24

Prakash Shrivastava, CP

¶25

¶26

Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM

¶27

May 09, 2024 Original Application No. 507/2024 AS.

¶28

News Item Titled "Ret Ka Avaidh Utkhanan Kar Parivahan Karne Walo Par Tabadtod Action Vibhag Ko Jurmane Se Hui Itne Lakh Kee Kamaee" Appearing in Khabar 36 Media Dated 04.03.2024 vs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

News Item Titled "Ret Ka Avaidh Utkhanan Kar Parivahan Karne Walo Par Tabadtod Action Vibhag Ko Jurmane Se Hui Itne Lakh Kee Kamaee" Appearing in Khabar 36 Media Dated 04.03.2024 vs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palayam S vs the Tamilnadu Coastal Zone Management Authority

Gregorio Judy Fernandes vs State of Goa

Krishna Harichandra Gaude vs State of Goa

Brackish Water Research Centre vs Gujarat Pollution Control Board

Mr. Santosh Vishnu Kadam vs M/S Shivsiddhi Redimix Concrete

Harihar Samal S/O Mathuri Samal Aged About 64 Years vs 1. State of Odisha Represented by Chief Secretary Government of Odisha

News Item Titled "8 Killed in Explosion at Fireworks Factory Near Sivakasi in Tamil Nadu" Appearing in Ndtv.Com Dated 09.05.2024 and News Item Titled "10 Workers Includimg Six Women Die in Sivakasi Fireworks Unit Blast" Appearing in the Hindu Dated 10.05.2024 vs

News Item Titled "No Crops No Brides: How Rising Seas Are Killing India,S Coastal Villages" Appearing in the Guardian Dated 11.03.2024 vs

Misc Application in disposed of cases No. 53/2024 in Original Application No. 754/2022 of Khem Chand vs

Devesh Kumar Verma vs Union of India

Kapil Kumar vs Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board

Misc Application in disposed of cases No. 82/2023 in Original Application No. 83/2020 of Krishan Chander vs Union of India

News Item Titled "Three Killed in Blast at Explosive Storage Unit in Virudhunagar" Appearing in the Hindu Dated 01.05.2024 vs

News Item Titled "Gariaband-Mahasamund Ke Ghaton Mei Ret Mafia Bekhauf Prashashan Kee Andekhi" Appearing in Janta Se Rishta Dated 04.03.2024 vs