Application alleging pollution by burning restricted wood was disposed of as the Gujarat Pollution Control Board report found no violations and listed the fuel as approved.
None. The application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(Pune Bench)
Item No.4
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL WESTERN ZONE BENCH, PUNE
THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING (WITH HYBRID OPTION)
Original Application No.18/2024(WZ) Earlier L.P. No.03/2024(WZ)
Dakshin Gujarat Kamdar Parishad
…..Applicant
Versus
Rajni Prints Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Date of hearing: 03.04.2024
….Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. VIJAY KULKARNI, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant : None appeared Respondent : Mr. Aravindakshan V. Nair, Advocate for R-2/GPCB
ORDER
Page 1 of 4
Pollution Control Board (GPCB) regarding truthfulness of the contents made in the complaint.
Page 2 of 4
”
Page 3 of 4
said to have emitted in the local area causing air pollution. It is also recorded in this report that the fire wood was included in the list of approved fuels.
Dinesh Kumar Singh, JM
Dr. Vijay Kulkarni, EM
April 03, 2024 Original Application No.18/2024(WZ) Earlier L.P. No.03/2024(WZ) P.Kr
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is ground to pass directions against the respondent for burning restricted wood based on the GPCB report.
Dakshin Gujarat Kamdar Parishad
Rajni Prints Pvt. Ltd.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Vijay Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
