Allowed

Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science v. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

NGT10 Jul 2024IA No. 73/2024 in Original Application No. 168/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed an I.A. to implead the Block Development Officer as Respondent No.5 and deleted the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority after it was given up. Matter listed for reports.

What did the court decide?

I.A. No.73 of 2024 (SZ) allowed; Block Development Officer impleaded as Respondent No.5; SEIAA deleted; notice issued.

Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science vs Tamil Nadu… — Environment and Pollution | NGT (2024)

¶1

Item No.6:-

¶2

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

¶3

(Through Video Conference)

¶4

Original Application No.168 of 2024 (SZ) & I.A. No.73 of 2024 (SZ)

¶5

IN THE MATTER OF:

¶6

M/s. Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science, Rep. by its Registrar Chennai.

¶7

…Applicant (s)
VERSUS
Member Secretary
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board
Chennai and Ors.
…Respondent(s)

¶8

Date of hearing: 10.07.2024.

¶9

CORAM :

¶10

HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

¶11

HON’BLE Dr. SATYAGOPAL KORLAPATI, EXPERT MEMBER

¶12

For Applicant(s): M/s. Kandhan Duraisami, J. Vinoth & U. Gokulakrishnan. For Respondent(s): Ms. Aarti represented Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith for R1. Ms. Y. Kavitha for R2. Dr. D. Shanmuganathan for R3 to R5. Ms. Aswathy Suresh represented M/s. C. Sangamithirai – TNSEIAA

¶13

Page 1 of 3

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

1. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the SEIAA – Tamil Nadu (Respondent No.4) is not a necessary party to this proceeding and he has given up the same by way of an endorsement.

¶16

2. Hence, the SEIAA – Tamil Nadu is deleted from the party array and the parties are re-arrayed accordingly.

¶17

3. The applicant has also filed an interlocutory application [I.A. No.73 of 2024 (SZ)] to implead the Block Development Officer – Tiruporur Taluk as an additional respondent to this proceeding. Accordingly, the I.A. No.73 of 2024 (SZ) is allowed and the Block Development Officer – Tiruporur Taluk is impleaded as Respondent No.5.

¶18

4. Let notice be issued to the 5^th Respondent through the Tribunal. The learned counsel Dr. D. Shanmuganathan accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.5.

¶19

5. The learned counsel appearing for the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board would submit that the water samples have been collected and sent for analysis. Similarly, the Sub Collector visited the property and the report is awaited.

¶20

Page 2 of 3

¶21

¶22

For filing the reports, let the matter be listed on

¶23

07.08.2024 .

¶24

Sd/Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, JM

¶25

Sd/Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, EM

¶26

O.A. No.168/2024 (SZ) I.A. No.73/2024 (SZ) 10^th July, 2024. Mn.

¶27

Page 3 of 3

Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science v. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Institute of Technology & Science v. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tejasvi Chandra vs Madhu Kamboj

Roshan Joshi vs State of Uttrakhand

Tejasvi Chandra vs Madhu Kamboj

Tejasvi Chandra vs Madhu Kamboj

Yadram vs State of Rajasthan

Yadram vs State of Rajasthan

Soban Singh Rana vs Roshan Lal Uniyal

Domingos Castro vs Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority

C Subramniyam vs the State of Tamilnadu through the Department of Geology and Mining

Bolisetty Satyanarayana vs State of Andhra Pradesh

R.Kanappan S/O Rangaiya Gowder vs 1. the Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Tumkunta Narsa Reddy vs State Environment Impact Assessment Authority Telangana

M/S Color Berry Flat Owners Welfare Association Represented by Its President Mr. N.Pradeep vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

Rodda Ravi Kumar vs State of Telangana