Dismissed
Kaushalya Sharma v. Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority
NGTIA No. 336/2024 in Original Application No. 698/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 03
Court No.2
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
I.A. No. 336/2024
In
Original Application No. 698/2023
Kaushalya Sharma Applicant
Versus
Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority & Anr. Respondents
Date of hearing: 09.09.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj, Advocate (through VC) Respondent: Mr. Rachit Mittal, Mr. Parish Mishra, Mr. Adarsh Srivastava and Ms. Kriti Jain, Advocates for respondent no. 1 (through VC) Mr. Rahul Khurana and Mr. Hasil Jain, Advocates for respondent no. 2 Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Ashish Singh Advocates for respondent no. 3
ORDER
in the matter, hence no order at his instance can be passed.
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
September 09, 2024 Original Application No. 698/2023 R
1
Kaushalya Sharma
Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority
Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An application for interim relief made while the main matter is pending.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court