Dimpal Kumar vs State of Punjab

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER

¶10

Applicant:

¶11

Mr. I.K. Kapila, Adv.

¶12

Respondent: Ms. Sunieta Ojha, Adv. with Mr. Vijay Kumar, E.E., Punjab PCB Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv. in I.A No. 856/2023

¶13

ORDER

¶14

I.A. No. 856/2023

¶15

Pursuant to our order dated 08.12.2023, details of the Member Industries have been placed by applicant seeking impleadment by application dated 14.12.2023 which shows that it has a total number 113 industries as Members. It is stated that these industries shall stand represented by applicant seeking impleaded.

¶16

Learned Counsel appearing for applicant did not raise any objection

¶17

for impeadment of the applicant’s Roller’s Association.

¶18

I.A. 856/2023 is allowed.

¶19

Let All India Steel Roller’s Association having its registered office at

¶20

New Delhi though its President be impleaded as respondent no 4. Newly impleaded respondent may file its response within three weeks.

¶21

1

¶22

We also find out from record that there 220 industries which are claimed to be violating the norms but they are not parties. Except industries which are represented through newly impleaded respondent no. 4, rest of industries are necessary party in matter. Applicant is allowed two weeks’ time to file appropriate application for their impleadment.

¶23

List this matter on 22.02.2024.

¶24

Sudhir Agarwal, JM

¶25

Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM

¶26

Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM

¶27

December 15, 2023 Original Application No. 295/2023 (I.A. No. 856/2023) SN

¶28

2

Dimpal Kumar v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dimpal Kumar v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasireddy Siva Linga Prasad vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Shailesh Singh vs State of Haryana

Shailesh Singh vs State of Haryana

Sujal Sahakari Gruha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit through Chairperson Mrs Ujwala Vivek Ghanekar vs the Commissioner Pune Municipal Corporation

Jagatmitra Foundation vs State of Punjab

Dabur India Limited vs National Biodiversity Authority

Pisati Indira Reddy vs Union of India

Mali Patel Raju Reddy vs Union of India

M/S Rathi Special Steels Ltd. vs Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas

M/S Rathi Special Steels Ltd. vs Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas

M/S Rathi Special Steels Ltd. vs Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas

Manoj Singh vs Principle Chief Conservator of Forest

Tribhuvan Singh vs