The Tribunal condoned a three-day delay in re-filing a Company Appeal due to defects noticed by the office. The appeal was listed for admission as a fresh case on 17.09.2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Interlocutory Application No.6438/2026 Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026 (F.No.24.08.2026/NCLAT/UR/08822)
In the matter of:
Mehul Vyas
Vs.
Fiba Shipping Agency & Ors.
..… Respondents
Appearance: Minal, Advocate for the Appellant.
Md. Arsalan Ahmed & Dhrupad Vaghani, Advocates for the Respondents.
10th September, 2026 (Hybrid Mode)
This is an application to extend the time granted for curing the defects.
The facts of the case are that the Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 07.08.2026. The Office after scrutiny of the Memo of Appeal on 24.08.2026, intimated the defects to the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 03.09.2026.
Heard Ld. Counsel for the Appellant and perused the averments made in the IA as well as Office report.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 03 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.
It is submitted by learned Counsel for the Appellant that this mater has been mentioned before the Hon’ble Bench and it is already listed before the Hon’ble Court on 17.09.2026. In view of the submission, let this Appeal be listed before the Hon’ble Court on 17.09.2026 under the heading ‘for admission (fresh case)’.
With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.
Mehul Vyas
Fiba Shipping Agency & Ors.
As recorded by the court registry
An application for interim relief made while the main matter is pending.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
