The appellant requested that the company law appeal be dismissed as withdrawn. The respondent raised no objection, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1646 of 2026 & I.A. No. 6296 of 2026
IN THE MATTER OF:
Sunita Jain …Appellant(s)
Versus
Ram Phal Bharadwaj & Anr.
…Respondent(s)
Present:
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mudit Gupta & Mr. Kapil Paliwal, Advocates For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mohit Nandwani & Mr. Om Gulati, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocate
O R D E R (Hybrid Mode)
22.09.2026 Shri Mudit Gupta, Learned Counsel for the Appellant, submits
under instructions that the instant appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
No objection in this regard has been raised by Learned Counsel for the RP.
In view of the request made by Learned Counsel for the Appellant, the
instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
[Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan] Member (Judicial)
KS/KM
[Ajai Das Mehrotra] Member (Technical)
P a g e 1 | 1
Sunita Jain
Ram Phal Bharadwaj & Anr.
Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan
Ajai Das Mehrotra
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal before NCLAT against an NCLT order in an insolvency proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
