The High Court of Manipur disposed of a writ petition (WP(C) No.677 of 2026) wherein the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one due to a defect in the name of parties.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Item No. 11-12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No.677 of 2026 With MC(WP(C)) No.698 of 2026
Haobijam Gitajen Meitei
Petitioner/s
Vs.
State of Manipur and 4 Ors.
Respondent/s
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
ORDER
09.09.2026
Heard Mr. Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S. Niranjan, learned Government Advocate and Mr. H. Kenajit, learned counsel for the respondents.
Mr. Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with the same cost as there is defect in the name of the parties in the petition.
Mr. S. Niranjan, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent and Mr. H. Kenajit, learned counsel for the LDA submitted that this Court may pass appropriate order with respect to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner considering the submission made at the Bar.
The present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh with the same cost, if so advised.
Misc.Case is also closed.
JUDGE
Ab. Surjit
Haobijam Gitajen Meitei
State of Manipur
A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
