Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one. No substantive adjudication on the merits of the petition was rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 92-94
Digitally signed KH. by KH. JOSHUA IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR MARING JOSHUA AT IMPHAL Date: MARING 2026.09.10 MC(WP(C) No. 468 of 2026 with 16:40:39 +05'30' MC(WP(C) No. 462 of 2026 with WP(C) No. 443 of 2026
Gurumayum Surjakumar Sharma
…..Petitioner/s
-Versus-
State of Manipur & 4 Ors.
….Respondent/s
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Order
09.09.2026
[1] Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. L. Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
[2] Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G.A. for the State respondent, submits that the oral prayer may be acceded to.
[3] Recording the oral submissions made at the bar, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one, if so advised. Misc. applications are also disposed of. Interim order, if any, is merged with the final order.
JUDGE
Kh. Joshua Maring
Gurumayum Surjakumar Sharma
State of Manipur
A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
K. JOSHUA MARING
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
