Petitioner moved a writ petition seeking closure of the matter, which counsel represented had become infructuous. The High Court of Manipur dismissed the writ petition on the same ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.7
JOHN
TELEN KOM
Digitally signed by JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2021.11.18 10:51:25 +05'30'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No.397 of 2018
(Through video conference)
Yangoijam Mani Singh, aged about 66 years, s/o (L) Y. Ibobi Singh, resident of Thoubal Kiyam Khundongbam Leikai Khong Ahanbi, PO & P.S. Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur.
…. Petitioner
- Versus –
.... Respondents
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN
17.11.2021
[1] Heard Mrs Maya Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanasam Niranjan, learned GA for the State respondents.
[2] Since Mrs. Maya Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that this matter has become infractuous and prayed this Court for closing this writ petition.
[3] Recording the said submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as infractuous.
JUDGE
John Kom
Yangoijam Mani Singh
The State of Manipur
MV MURALIDARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
