Sundaramoorthy G v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, Madurai Bench (D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.), on 23-03-2026 disposed of W.P.(MD).No.7526 of 2026 (G. Sundaramoorthy v. The Commissioner and The Joint Commissioner, HR&CE Department, Madurai District) at the admission stage, without expressing any opinion on merits. Mandamus sought under Article 226 for appointment of a Fit Person under S.49 of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, assumption of direct management, and restoration/re-mutation of temple lands (including S.No.216/3A, allegedly wrongfully mutated in the name of Senthil Kumar S/o Ramasamy Naicker) under Ss.78 and 79, regarding Arulmigu Arumugaswamy Temple, Vadakkunatham, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. Court noted the temple is yet to be listed but is a public temple, and that the persons in charge were not parties; directed the Assistant Commissioner, Virudhunagar District to enquire into the 15.10.2025 representation with due notice to the petitioner, interested persons and holders in whose name patta was changed, and to pass appropriate orders; further directed re-mutation of records in the temple's favour and administration through a fit person. No costs. Keywords: Fit Person, HR&CE Act 1959, S.49, Ss.78-79, patta mutation, temple land, listed/public temple, writ of mandamus.