Dismissed¶22

Johnson v. The Superintendent, CBI

Madras HC27 Apr 2026WP(MD)/4508/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ of Mandamus; Article 226 of Constitution of India; withdrawal of petition with endorsement; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; CBI Anti Corruption Department Madurai; State Bank of India SME Branch Dindigul Regional Manager and Branch Manager; Sri.Shanmugavel Mills Pvt. Limited; representation dated 28.01.2025; W.P.(MD)No.4508 of 2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice B.PugaleNdhi. Correction: Justice B.Pugalendhi.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition was granted (counsel's endorsement recorded); the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs. ¶22

Johnson Vs The Superintendent, CBI — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.4508 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.04.2026

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.4508 of 2025

Johnson

... Petitioner

The Superintendent, CBI, Anti Corruption Department, No. 73, Aathikulam, Pudur Vandipathai Road, Reserve Line Post, Madurai 625 014.

¶11

The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, SME Branch, Dindigul..

¶12

3.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, SME Branch, Dindigul.

¶13

Sivaraj,, S/o. Kandhasamy, Manager, Sri.Shanmugavel Mills Pvt. Limited, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District. .... Respondents

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Prayer :

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.4508 of 2025

¶18

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against 2 to 4th respondents on based on the petitioners representation dated 28.01.2025.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Vel Pradeep For Respondent : Mr.C.Muthu Saravanan No.1 Spl Public Prosecutor for CBI, For Respondent : Mr.S.Anwar Sameem Nos.2 and 3 For Respondent : Mr.P.Sathiyanathan No.4

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶22

2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶23

No costs.

¶24

27.04.2026

¶25

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No DSK

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis