Disposed¶33

Sankarapandian v. The District Collector

Madras HC6 Feb 2026WP(MD)/3141/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registration of sale deed; refusal by Sub Registrar on third-party objection; objection by one Paramanandham; proper procedure - receive document, issue notice to pattadhars, hear parties, then decide registration; re-presentation of sale deed; decision in accordance with law; Writ of Mandamus; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD) No.3141 of 2026; Thoothukudi; Murappanadu; sale deed dated 06.10.2023; Temporary Reg No.TP/161642299/2023; Krishnan Ramasamy J.; disposed with directions; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed of with directions: petitioner to re-present the sale deed; 2nd respondent to take it on record, issue notice to the parties concerned if any objection is received, and thereafter decide registration of the sale deed in accordance with law; no order as to costs.

Sankarapandian Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the Sub Registrar (2nd respondent) may refuse/return a presented sale deed solely on a third-party objection, or whether the proper procedure is to receive the document, issue notice to the pattadhars, hear the parties and then decide on registration.

¶28

Court's answer

When a document is presented for registration and a third-party objection is received, the registering authority must not merely return the document; it must receive the document, issue notice to the pattadhars, hear the parties, and then take a decision with regard to registration of the document. In the present case, this procedure was not followed by the respondents.

¶28

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner is directed to re-present the sale deed before the 2nd respondent; upon such re-presentation the 2nd respondent shall take it on record and, if any objection is received, shall issue notice to the parties concerned and thereafter take a decision regarding registration of the sale deed in accordance with law.

¶29

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), Krishnan Ramasamy J. - W.P.(MD) No.3141 of 2026 (decided 06.02.2026): Petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Sub Registrar, Murappanadu (Thoothukudi District) to register his sale deed dated 06.10.2023 in Temporary Reg No.TP/161642299/2023, which had been refused on an objection raised by one Paramanandham. The Court held that where a presented document attracts a third-party objection, the registering authority must not merely return the document; it must receive it, issue notice to the pattadhars, hear the parties, and only then take a decision on registration - a procedure the respondents had failed to follow. Accordingly, the petitioner was directed to re-present the sale deed, and the 2nd respondent was directed to take it on record, issue notice to the parties concerned if objections were received, and decide registration in accordance with law. Writ Petition disposed of; no order as to costs.

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.3141 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 06.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.3141 of 2026

Sankarapandian

... Petitioner

The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Thoothukudi.

¶11

The Sub Registrar, Murappanadu, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to register the sale deed dated 06.10.2023 in Temporary Reg No.TP/161642299/2023 in favor of the petitioner within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents : Mr.V.Om Prakash, Govt. Advocate

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD) No.3141 of 2026

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2^nd respondent to register the sale deed dated 06.10.2023 in Temporary Reg No.TP/161642299/2023 in favor of the petitioner within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.

¶19

2. By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶20

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted

¶21

that when the petitioner presented a sale deed for registration, the respondents refused to register the same on the ground that there was an objection by one Paramanandham. Hence, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for the above said relief.

¶22

4 . The learned Government Advocate appearing for the

¶23

respondents would submit that since there was an objection, the respondents are not in a position to register the sale deed presented by the petitioner.

¶24

2/6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(MD) No.3141 of 2026

¶27

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that if any document is presented for registration and

¶28

any objection is received by the respondents from third parties with regard to the said property, instead of merely returning the document, the proper course is that, after receiving the document, the respondents are supposed to issue notice to the pattadhars and after hearing the parties, the respondents supposed to take a decision with regard to the registration of the said document. In the present case, the said procedure has not been followed by the respondents.

¶29

6. In view of the above, this Court directs the petitioner to re-present the sale deed before the second respondent. Upon such representation, the second respondent is directed to take the same on record and, if any objection is received, the 2^nd respondent is directed to issue notice to the parties concerned and thereafter shall take a decision regarding registration of the sale deed in accordance with law.

¶30

3/6

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(MD) No.3141 of 2026

¶33

7 . With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶34

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

06.02.2026