Udaiyappan K.M v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
K.M.Udaiyappan; TANGEDCO; Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation; writ of mandamus; Article 226; electricity service connection; agricultural service connection; infructuous prayer; objections dated 20.01.2022 and 29.01.2022; illegal sand quarrying; Pambaru river; Ramparu River bed; water catchment area; electric poles encroachment; patta proceedings; Survey No.319, 320/2, 323/7; Valarmanickam Village; Thirumayam Taluk; Pudukkottai District; Chinna Durai; Ariyal; Pandiyan; Henri Tiphagne; S.Deendhayalan; V.K.Vijayaragavan; G.R.Swaminathan; B.Pugalendhi; W.P(MD)No.2359 of 2022; W.M.P.(MD)No.2047 of 2022; dismissed; no costs; 09.04.2026
What did the court decide?
The first part of the prayer no longer survives and has become infructuous, because the agricultural service connection for the private respondents had already been effected by the hearing date of 09.04.2026.