Elizabeth v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Certiorari writ petition (Article 226) by Elizabeth against Tuticorin Municipal Corporation officials — The Commissioner, Tuticorin Municipal Corporation, and The Executive Engineer (Planning), Tuticorin Municipal Corporation, Thoothukudi — challenging Impugned Notice Na.Ka.No.C5/1858/Ki.Ma/2019 dated 09/12/2021. Disposed of as infructuous on 24.03.2026 before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (G.R.Swaminathan, J.; R.POORNIMA, J.); no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19405 and 19407 of 2021 closed. Advocates: Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for petitioner; Mr.N.Anandakumar for respondents. No precedent relied upon and no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
As the matter had become infructuous in view of subsequent developments (as informed by learned counsel for the petitioner), the Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly, awarded no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions (W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19405 and 19407 of 2021); the validity of the impugned notice was not adjudicated on merits.