Arulmighu Pallathalamman Kovil v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Land acquisition compensation; temple land; hereditary trustee; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; representation dated 26.09.2025; sixteen weeks; District Collector Tiruchirappalli; District Revenue Officer (L & A); Samayapuram Mariamman Temple access road; punja land; Old S.No.125/2; New S.Nos.162/2A-162/2E; 5 acres; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD) No.2237 of 2026; K. Surender J.; decided 30.01.2026; disposed with directions; opportunity of hearing; no costs; no compensation quantum stated.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions to the first respondent (District Collector, Tiruchirappalli) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2025 and pass appropriate orders on its merits and in accordance with law within sixteen weeks from receipt of a copy of the order, after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other affected/interested parties; if the petitioner is entitled, the compensation shall be disbursed in accordance with law; no order as to costs.