Allowed¶20
K.Sadhasivam v. The Principal District Judge
Writ Petition (Article 226) – Certiorarified Mandamus – Pension proposal
Madras HCWP(MD)/21627/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Sadhasivam v. Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi | W.P(MD) No.21627 of 2023 & W.M.P.(MD)No.18033 of 2023 | Madras High Court, Madurai Bench | 04.03.2026 | G.R. Swaminathan J. (author), R. Poornima J. | Impugned order: Order/Proceedings No.A1.No.178/2023 dt. 31.05.2023 | Quashed in view of order dt. 14.10.2025 in W.P.(MD)No.30511 of 2024 (same petitioner) for the very same reasons | Writ allowed, no costs, connected misc petition closed | Subject: pension proposal.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order (Order/Proceedings No.A1.No.178/2023, dated 31.05.2023) stands quashed; Writ Petition allowed with no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (W.M.P.(MD)No.18033 of 2023) closed. ¶20