Rajialli v. The Authorized Officer
SARFAESI – Possession records and recovery videography – Borrower's entitlement
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), W.P.(MD)No.16415 of 2026, order dated 24.06.2026 by Hemant Chandangoudar J.; Petitioners Rajialli, A.M.Arunchandar and A.M.Manish Chandar vs The Authorised Officer and The Manager, Canara Bank, West Avani Moola Street Branch, Madurai. Keywords: Article 226 writ of mandamus; SARFAESI Act Section 14 symbolic/physical possession of secured asset; allegation of forcible possession and removal of valuables including gold jewellery; sale certificate set aside by Debt Recovery Tribunal; appeal pending before Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal; RTI application and reply Ref. No. ROMDU/PIO/RTI/2025-26/AMAC-2; no appeal under Right to Information Act needed where request not rejected; borrower entitled to copies of possession records and videography; Bank bound to preserve and furnish records; direction to furnish in CD/DVD/Pen Drive format within ten days; no costs; loan account closure claimed by petitioner, disputed by Bank.