Dismissed¶19

M/s.Prince Seafoods Exports v. the State Tax Officer (Roving Squad 1)

Madras HC8 Jun 2026WP(MD)/15186/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; Prince Seafoods Exports v. State Tax Officer (Roving Squad 1), Tirunelveli; GST order dated 27.02.2026; certiorari under Article 226; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appeal to Appellate Authority; no costs; Madurai Bench; single judge D. Bharatha Chakravarthy; no substantive ruling on jurisdiction or statutory violation.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶19

M/s.Prince Seafoods Exports Vs the State Tax Officer… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.15186 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 08.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

W.P(MD)No.15186 of 2026 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)No.11375 of 2026

¶8

M/s.Prince Seafoods Exports, Rep by its Proprietor S. Irudayaraj, GSTIN 33ATVPS1146H2ZC, 6/220/3 East Coastal Road, Tharuvaikulam, Thoothukudi.

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

The State Tax Officer (roving Squad 1), O/O the Joint Commissioner (IW) Commercial Tax Building, Tirunelveli. ...Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in the impugned Order in GSTIN 33ATVPS1146H2ZC/2021-22 dated 27.02.2026 issued by the Respondent and quash the same as it is without jurisdiction and clear violation of statutory provisions and pass such further or other orders as this Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice.

¶13

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P(MD)No.15186 of 2026

¶16

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Karunakar For Respondent :Mr.P.Rajagopalan Government Standing Counsel

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When the matter came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, however, with liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority

¶19