Vanitha v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to consider petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2023; dismissed as infructuous on 06.01.2026 by Krishnan Ramasamy, J.; no appearance for petitioner; Government Advocate submission of infrunctuousness recorded; no order as to costs; respondents include District Collector, Superintendent of Police, Revenue Divisional Officer (Musiri), Tahsildar (Thottiyam), Tiruchirappalli District, and temple committee members of Shree Bagavathi Amman and Shree Magaa Mariamman Temple, Naagayanallur Village; no merits decided; low citational value.
What did the court decide?
Recording the learned Government Advocate's submission that the petitioner's prayer had become infructuous, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and made no order as to costs. ¶29