Dismissed¶29

Veerappan v. The District Collector / Monitory Committee

Madras HC2 Jun 2026WP(MD)/11869/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Writ of Certiorari; impugned notice proceedings No.Athimu 77/2026 dated 09.04.2026; Revenue Inspector, Silattur Saragam; Tahsildar Aranthangi; Pudukottai District; petitioner absent, no appearance; no order as to costs; connected W.M.P.(MD)No.8971 of 2026 closed; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; N. Sathish Kumar, J. and M. Jothiraman, J.

What did the court decide?

When the matter was called for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either by person or through counsel. ¶25

Veerappan Vs The District Collector / Monitory… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 02.06.2026

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.11869 of 2026

¶8

and W.M.P.(MD)No.8971 of 2026

Veerappan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector / Monitory Committee, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

¶13

2.The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

¶14

3.The Revenue Inspector, Silattur Saragam, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

¶15

4.The Head Surveyor, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

5.The Block Development Officer, Village Panchayats, Aranthangi Panchayat Uion, Aranthangi, Pudukottai District.

¶19

6.The President, Silattur Panchayat Board, Silattur Panchayat, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

¶20

...Respondents

¶21

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned notice in proceedings No.Athimu 77/2026 dated 09.04.2026 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same.

¶22

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan (R1 to R6) Senior Counsel for Mr.M.P.Senthil Counsel for the State

¶23

ORDER

¶24

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

¶25

When the matter is called for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners either by person or through counsel.

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis