I.Joseph Raj Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order of the 3^rd Respondent vide his Proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3510/A2/2025 dated 23.01.2026 excluding one Post of B.T. Assistant (Social Science) Teacher as surplus with the Teacher and consequential Impugned Order issued by the 4^th Respondent in his proceedings dated 16.03.2026 redeploying the Petitioner from the 5^th Respondent school to the 6^th Respondent school and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the Respondents No.3 to 5 to allow the Petitioner to work in the Post of B.T. Assistant Social Science in the 5^th respondent school with all consequential and other attendant benefits and for other reliefs.

¶19

2/7

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance

¶22

W.P(MD) No.11261 of 2026

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar – for R1 to R3 Additional Government Pleader

¶24

ORDER

¶25

This writ petition has been filed seeking writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 3^rd respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 3510/A2/2025, dated 23.01.2026 and the proceedings dated 16.03.2026 issued by the 4th respondent.

¶26

Insofar as the challenge to the proceedings dated 23.01.2026 is concerned, the petitioner cannot be said to be neither aggrieved nor affected party, coming to the proceedings dated 16.03.2026, whereby, the petitioner was transferred from 5th respondent School to 6th respondent school under the management of the 4th respondent, the same cannot be said to be consequent to the proceedings dated 16.03.2026. But the petitioner has filed the present writ petition

¶27

3/7

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P(MD) No.11261 of 2026

¶30

treating the order of redeployment, as a consequential to the proceedings dated 23.01.2026.

¶31

Learned Counsel for the petitioner also strenuously contended that the proceeding dated 16.032026 is an order issued consequent upon the proceedings dated 23.01.2026.

¶32

The perusal of the proceedings dated 23.01.2026 and the proceedings dated 16.03.2026 does not in any manner suggest that the proceedings dated 16.03.2026 is an order issued consequent upon the issuance of proceedings dated 23.01.2026. Further, a careful perusal of the proceedings dated 16.03.2026 would disclose that the same is a simple order of transfer, transferring the petitioner from 5^th respondent school to a vacant post available in 6^th respondent school. The said vacancy in the 6^th respondent school is also shown to have been arisen consequent upon retirement of the existing incumbent with effect from 28.02.2026.

¶33

4/7

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P(MD) No.11261 of 2026

¶36

From the above, it is evident that the proceedings dated

¶37

16.03.2026 is an independent proceeding issued by the 4^th respondent transferring the petitioner from the 5^th respondent school to the 6^th respondent school duly posting the petitioner in an existing vacancy that arose on 28.02.2026. Therefore, the proceedings dated 16.03.2026 as an order of redeployment, consequent upon the proceedings dated 23.01.2026 is an erroneous understanding of the said proceedings and in the considered view of this Court, such a contention is raised only with a view to mislead this Court and to have an undue advantage.

¶38