S.Soundra Pandian Vs The Secretary

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Senthil Sivaganesh For Respondents : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai for R3

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to return the petitioner's original sale deeds dated 25.10.2006 bearing Document No.2980/2006 registered at

¶25

Arasaradi Sub Registrar Office.

¶26

The petitioner had availed loan of Rs.3,00,000/- by mortgaging

¶27

the original sale deed. Thereafter, the petitioner repaid the entire loan amount and discharge certificate was issued on 10.05.2019. However, the original sale deed deposited by the petitioner has not been returned. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶28

2/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that the third respondent provides financial assistance to the first respondent, who in turn disburse loan to its members. In the present case, the first respondent is giving a sum of Rs.12,93,359/as of today. In such circumstances, the sale deed deposited by the petitioner with the first respondent cannot be returned unless the first respondent discharges the loan amount due to the third respondent.

¶31

In similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P(MD)No.5791 of 2024 dated 27.06.2024 directed the first respondent therein to release the sale deed to the petitioner while preserving the liberty of the first respondent to proceed against the society, which is the third respondent therein, in the manner known to law. The release of the sale deed cannot be denied to a borrower who has discharged the loan amount. The petitioner, having discharged the loan amount, is entitled to the release of the document, and withholding the same would be arbitrary.

¶32

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed. The third respondent is directed to release the original sale deed to the petitioner within a period of four(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, while 3/6

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

preserving liberty of the third respondent to proceed against the first

¶35

respondent, in accordance with law.

¶36