Pannerselvam @ M.Arumugavel v. The Superintendent of Police, Karur
Case brief
What is this about?
Police protection writ petition, Article 226 Constitution of India, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3007 of 2026, L. Victoria Gowri J., 09.06.2026. Petitioner Paneerselvam @ M.Arumugavel complained (14.05.2026) of threats by private respondents Chandrasekar, Balu @ Balasubramanian, Samiyappan; Karur Town Police enquiry pending. Direction: consider complaint, summon parties under Section 64 of the BNSS, hear parties, conclude enquiry within four weeks of receiving copy of order; notice to private respondents dispensed as no adverse order proposed; writ petition disposed with directions. Keywords: police protection, threats, complaint enquiry, summons, Section 64 BNSS, Karur, four weeks, disposed.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the second respondent police to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 14.05.2026, conduct an enquiry after issuing summons to the parties concerned under Section 64 of the BNSS, afford the parties an opportunity of hearing, and conclude the enquiry within four weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; notice to the private respondents dispensed with.