Disposed¶32

Aishwarya v. The Commissioner of Police

Madras HC11 Mar 2026WP Crl./413/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP Crl. No. 413 of 2026; Madras High Court; M. Nirmal Kumar, J.; 11-03-2026; writ of mandamus; direction to police to conduct enquiry; complaint dated 12.02.2026; cheating; 15 sovereigns of gold; promise of Government job assistance; private respondents Hariram and Mgr Nambi; K2 police station Ayanavaram; summons for 01.03.2026 unanswered; petitioner's undertaking to appear 17.03.2026; Additional Public Prosecutor Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam; counsel R. Ramesh; Criminal Original Petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent (Inspector of Police, K2 Police Station, Ayanavaram) to conduct an enquiry on the petitioner's complaint and complete it as expeditiously as possible; Criminal Original Petition disposed of with the above direction. ¶32

Aishwarya Vs The Commissioner of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WP Crl. No. 413 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

WP Crl. No. 413 of 2026

Aishwarya

..Petitioner

The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Vepery, Chennai – 600007.

¶11

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ayanavaram Range,chennai - 600010.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, K2 police station, Ayanavaram, No.224, Konnur High Road, Tagore Nagar,

¶13

Chinna Chembarambakkam, Chennai - 600010.

¶14

Hariram

¶15

5. Mgr Nambi

¶16

..Respondents

¶17

To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to conduct enquiry and to initiate appropriate action as against the respondents 4 and 5 on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner dated 12.02.2026

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3

¶19

Page1 of 4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

WP Crl. No. 413 of 2026

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The case of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent, who is her neighbour, introduced the fifth respondent stating that he would assist her in securing a Government job. Believing the words of the fourth respondent, the petitioner handed over 15 sovereigns of gold to the fifth respondent. Subsequently, she came to know that both respondents had cheated her. Hence, she lodged a complaint dated 12.02.2026 before the respondent police. As no steps were taken, she has filed the present petition.

¶24

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, on receipt of the petitioner’s complaint dated 12.02.2026, summons was issued to the petitioner for her appearance on 01.03.2026 to provide further details and to submit supporting documents, if any. However, the petitioner did not respond to the summons issued by the third respondent.

¶25