Dismissed¶31

N.Jayasankar v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC25 Mar 2026WP Crl./391/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.Crl.No.391 of 2026; 25.03.2026; M. Nirmal Kumar, J.; writ petition criminal dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement; withdrawal; writ of mandamus; Section 226 of Constitution of India; police protection; land measurement/survey by Tahsildar; S.No.439/3B2 Thiyaranathurkam Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District; representation dated 15.12.2025; no ruling on merits; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

In view of the endorsement made by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw, the Writ Petition Criminal stands dismissed as withdrawn; the merits were not adjudicated. ¶31

N.Jayasankar Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.Crl.No.391 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.03.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

W.P.Crl.No.391 of 2026

N.Jayasankar

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Collectorate Campus, Krishnagiri 635 001.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Uddanapalli Police Station, Shoolagiri Taluk 635 119, Krishnagiri District.

¶12

3.The Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District 635 119.

¶13

4.Manjunath @ Manjunatha

¶14

5.Muniraj @ Muniraju

¶15

6.Seenivasan @ Seenivasu

¶16

7.Munichandra

¶17

8.Murugesh

¶18

9.Venkatesh

¶19

10.Nagaraji

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

PRAYER: Writ Petition Criminal is filed under Section 226 of Constitution

¶22

of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st and 2^nd respondents

¶23

to give Police protection enabling the 3^rd respondent to measure the property, Page No.1 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.Crl.No.391 of 2026 being the lands in S.No.439/3B2 Thiyaranathurkam Village, Shoolagiri

¶26

Taluk, Krishnagiri District measuring about 0.09.71 Hectares or 24 cents, in pursuant to the representation dated 15.12.2025.

¶27

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Revathy For R1 & R2 : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶28

ORDER

¶29

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition Criminal and also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶30

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the

¶31

petitioner, this Writ Petition Criminal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

25.03.2026

¶33

Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶34

vv2

¶35

Page No.2 of 4