Dismissed¶21

R.Sathyanarayanamurthy v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC4 Mar 2026WP/977/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; WP No. 977 of 2023; Justice Krishnan Ramasamy; Article 226; writ of Mandamus; Urban Land Ceiling; Urban Land Tax; innocent buyer category; regularisation of sale deed dated 21/8/2008; S.No. 95/1, 2, 3 and New S.No. 95/2B, 3A, C; Ganapathy, Coimbatore; G.O. Ms. No. 565 Revenue NA / NEE / U1(1) dated 26/09/2008; G.O. Ms. No. 649 Revenue NA/ NEE/ U1(1) dated 29.07.1998; Government of Tamil Nadu Revenue Department; Special Commissioner Urban Land Ceiling Chennai; Competent Authority Coimbatore; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; R.Rajarajan; T.K.Saravanan AGP.

What the court decided

AI extract

R.Sathyanarayanamurthy Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 977 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 04-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 977 of 2023

¶6

R.Sathyanarayanamurthy S/o. V.Ranganathan, No. 55, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, Coimbatore

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai

¶10

2.the Special commissioner Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land tax, Chepauk, Chennai 05

¶11

3.The Competent Authority and Assistant commissioner, Urban Land tax, Coimbatore

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

PRAYER

¶14

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus,, directing the respondents to regularise the sale deed dated 21/8/2008 under the innocent buyer category and regularise the property admeasuring 5 cents and 210 square feet comprised in the S.No. 95/ 1, 2, 3 and New S.No. 95/ 2B, 3A, C situated at Ganapathy, Coimbatore district in terms of G.O. Ms. No. 565 Revenue NA / NEE / U1(1) department dated

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP No. 977 of 2023

¶17

26/09/2008 on the file of the 1st respondent and G.O. Ms. No. 649 Revenue NA/ NEE/ U1(1) department dated 29.07.1998 on the file of the 1st respondent.

¶18

For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP

¶19

ORDER

¶20

When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition and in this regard, he had also made an endorsement in the case bundle.

¶21