N.Suguna Vs the Managing Drector

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 4 herein to issue patta in respect of the land admeasuring 11.06 acres comprised in survey No.452/1A, 452/2, 455/2, 457, 461/1B, 470/1, 471 and 472 situated at Chennathur Village Hosur taluk Krishnagiri District without insisting No Objection Certificate from the 1st and 3rd respondents / Tamil

¶19

1/5

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.No.9375 of 2025

¶22

Nadu Housing Board based on the petitioner’s representation dated 10.01.2025 within the time frame to be stipulated by this Court

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar

¶24

For Respondents 1 & 3 : Mr.S.Ramachandran Standing Counsel For Respondents 2 & 4 : Mr.P.Sathish

¶25

Standing Counsel Additional Government Pleader

¶26

Order

¶27

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a mandamus to direct the

¶28

respondents 2 and 4 to issue patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this Writ Petition in favour of the petitioner without insisting for an NOC from the respondents 1 and 3 based on the petitioner’s representation

¶29

dated 10.01.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶30

2. The petitioner claims that, earlier, land acquisition proceedings

¶31

were initiated against the property, for which, relief is sought for, in this Writ Petition. The same has been declared to be lapsed by orders of this Court dated 30.10.2015 in W.P.Nos.10604 and 10605 of 2014. In view of the same, the petitioner claims that she is entitled for patta for the said property in her name. The petitioner had given a representation dated 10.01.2025 for 2/5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.No.9375 of 2025 issuance of patta in her name for the property morefully described in the prayer to this Writ Petition since the land acquisition proceedings has got lapsed by virtue of the orders passed by this Court in the aforesaid Writ Petitions. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

¶34

3. The respondents 1 and 3 have filed their counter affidavit. Remaining respondents, viz,. respondents 2 and 4 have not filed their counter affidavit till date.

¶35

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation seeking for issuance of patta in her name is considered on merits and in accordance with law in the light of the orders dated 30.10.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.10604 and 10605 of 2014 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation made by the petitioner.

¶36

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondents 2 and

¶37

4 to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the

¶38

3/5

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.No.9375 of 2025

¶41

petitioner’s representation dated 10.01.2025 seeking for issuance of patta in

¶42

her name for the property morefully described in the prayer to this Writ Petition in the light of the orders dated 30.10.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.10604 and 10605 of 2014 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶43

6. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

costs.

09.01.2026

sd

Index : yes/no Neutral Citation : yes/no

¶48

To