Dismissed¶29

S.P.Singaravel v. Primrose School Rep by the

Madras HC13 Feb 2026WP/9252/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court writ petition dismissed as withdrawn (13.02.2026, Hemant Chandangoudar J.). Keywords: Article 226 mandamus; pay scale implementation; Post Graduate Teacher / Lecturer; Trained Graduate Teacher; Government of Puducherry pay scale; Primrose School Oulgaret Puducherry; Director of School Education; Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations; withdrawal endorsement; W.M.P.No.9798 of 2019 closed; no costs. No statutes applied beyond Article 226 (basis of filing); no cases cited; no ratio on merits - do not cite for substantive law.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement, connected miscellaneous petition closed, no order as to costs. ¶29

S.P.Singaravel Vs Primrose School Rep by the — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.9252 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶6

W.P.No.9252 of 2019 and

¶7

W.M.P.No.9798 of 2019

¶8

S.P.Singaravel S/o.S.Packirisamy

¶9

D.Moganadasse S/o.Dhanaraj

¶10

L.Dominic Xavier S/o.Lourdusamy

¶11

M.Senthil Kumar S/o.Moorthy

¶12

K.Veerappan S/o.Kannan ... Petitioners vs.

¶13

Primrose School Rep. By the Administrative Principal No.63, Kundu Salai, Oulgaret, Puducherry.

¶14

The Director of School Education Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.

¶15

Page Nos.1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.9252 of 2019

¶18

¶19

The Secretary, Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations Pragati House, 3^rd Floor, 47-48 Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110 019. … Respondents

¶20

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to implement the pay scale as prescribed by the Government of Puducherry for the post of Post Graduate Teacher (Now designated as “Lecturer”) and Trained Graduate Teacher with effect from the date on which the petitioners became permanent employees with all other consequential benefits including arrears of wages.

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ajayakumar For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Naveen, for R1 Mr.R.Syed Mustafa Special Government Pleader for R2 R3 – Served – No Appearance

¶22

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

Mr.V.Ajayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks

¶25

permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶26

Page Nos.2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.9252 of 2019

¶29

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the captioned Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

13.02.2026

¶31

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk

¶32

¶33