Dismissed¶33

Ramalingam v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Mar 2026WP/8568/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Article 226 mandamus; removal of encroachment on public roads; Paravalur Village; Vriddhachalam; Cuddalore district; representations dated 11.08.2025 and 11.09.2025; respondents include District Collector, District Revenue Officer, Revenue Divisional Officer, Tahsildhar and three private occupants; endorsement of withdrawal; no order as to costs; no merits adjudication; Madras High Court, 09.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

In view of the petitioner's counsel's submission and the endorsement made, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn; there shall be no order as to costs. ¶33

Ramalingam Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.8568 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 09.03.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶8

W.P.No.8568 of 2026

¶9

Ramalingam S/o.Samikannu

¶10

... Petitioner

¶11

vs.

¶12

The District Collector Collector Office, Cuddalore District.

¶13

The District Revenue Officer Collector Office, Cuddalore District.

¶14

The Revenue Divisional officer Revenue Divisional Office Vriddhachalam Cuddalore District.

¶15

The Tahsildhar Vriddhachalam Taluk Office Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore District.

¶16

Chinnaiya @ Balasubramanian S/o.Kalliyaperumal

¶17

Chinnathambi @ Rajenthiran S/o.Dhuraisamy

¶18

Page Nos.1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.8568 of 2026

¶21

7. Narayanan S/o.Perumal

¶22

… Respondents

¶23

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representations dated 11.08.2025 and 11.09.2025 to remove the encroachment made by the illegal occupants including the respondents 5 to 7 in the public road of West, East Middle Street and Sivan Kovil Street of Paravalur Village Survey Nos.45, 46, 193/H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, 193/112, 200/20, 21, 195/1B, 341/9, 198/1A, 1B, 2A1, 198/2B, 3, 20G, 20H, 20I, 199/4C, 4D, 200/7, 8, 11, 333/1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 208/10, 321/1, 324/1, 327, 331, 332, 335, 336, 337, 339/16, 18, 343, 318, 323/1, 325/2, 3, 14, 326, 327, 333, 333/26, 27, 316/1, 9, 334/12, 17, 20, 317/6, 7, 10, 344/4, 345/3, 13, 342/22, 324/1, 11, 330/2, 322/18, 26, 31, 347, 343, 203, 128/1 and others, by conducting the survey of entire stretch of the land.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Meganathan For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Prem Kumar Government Advocate for R1 to R4 *********

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

[Made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., ]

¶27

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.T.Meganathan, learned counsel on record for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect

¶28

Page Nos.2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.8568 of 2026

¶31

in the case bundle.

¶32