Dismissed¶25

B.Vasuki, v. The Commissioner

Madras HC10 Feb 2026WP/8537/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn: W.P.Nos. 8537 & 8538 of 2017, High Court of Judicature at Madras, decided 10.02.2026 (neutral citation 2026:MHC:545). Petitioners B.Vasuki and M.Rajeswari versus The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai and The Executive Engineer, Zone VI, Greater Chennai Corporation. Writs of certiorarified mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of Notices No. Z.O.6.C.No./83/2017 and No. Z.O.6.C.No./85/2017, both dated 17.02.2017, as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21, and action on representations dated 06.03.2017 for regularization of construction. Counsel: Ms.R.Meenakshi for petitioners; Mr.C.Kulanthaivelu SPC for respondents. Withdrawal endorsed by counsel; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs. No legal issue adjudicated; minimal citable content.

B.Vasuki, Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

2026:MHC:545

¶2

W.P.Nos. 8537 & 8538 of 2017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 10.02.2026

¶5

CORAM :

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

¶7

W.P.Nos. 8537 & 8538 of 2017

¶8

and

¶9

W.M.P.Nos. 4599, 4598 of 2020, 9325 & 9326 of 2017

¶10

B.Vasuki .. Petitioner

¶11

in WP 8537/2017

¶12

M.Rajeswari

¶13

.. Petitioner in WP 8538/2017

¶14

¶15

1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai – 600 003.

¶16

2.The Executive Engineer, Zone VI, Greater Chennai Corporation, Zonal Office, No.5, Anderson Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai – 600 023. .. Respondents in both WPs

¶17

Prayer in W.P.No. 8537/2017: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned Notice No. Z.O.6.C.No./83/2017, dated 17.02.2017 issued by the office of the 2^nd respondent and quash the same on the ground of it being arbitrary, discriminatory exercise of powers, violative of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent no. 1

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.Nos. 8537 & 8538 of 2017 and 2 to act on petitioner’s representation dated 06.03.2017 by regularizing the construction.

¶21

Prayer in W.P.No. 8538/2017: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to impugned Notice No. Z.O.6.C.No./85/2017, dated 17.02.2017 issued by the office of the 2^nd respondent and quash the same on the ground of it being arbitrary, discriminatory exercise of powers, violative of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent no. 1 and 2 to act on petitioner’s representation dated 06.03.2017 by regularizing her construction.

¶22

(In Both) For Petitioner : Ms.R.Meenakshi For Respondents : Mr.C.Kulanthaivelu SPC

¶23

COMMON ORDER (Made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.)

¶24

Mrs.R.Meenakshi, learned counsel on record for petitioner, makes

¶25

an endorsement withdrawing these writ petitions, recording which, writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous

¶26

petitions are closed.

¶27

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm