P.Ganesan v. The Additional Secretary (Technical)
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, W.P.No.643 of 2026, decided 20.01.2026 (Shrivastava CJ and G. Arul Murugan J; order authored by the Chief Justice): dismissal of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of a 26.04.2025 communication of the Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation and a direction to consider the petitioner's 04.09.2025 representation for action under Section 56 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971; dismissed because the communication could have been, but was not, challenged in the earlier disposed writ petition W.P.No.32468 of 2025 (26.08.2025) and because concluded proceedings had declared the construction unauthorised, illegal and without permission.
What did the court decide?
The challenge to the impugned communication dated 26.04.2025 cannot be entertained, in view of the order earlier passed in W.P.No.32468 of 2025 dated 26.08.2025.