Masjid E Mubarak v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, W.P.No.5366 of 2026, decided 17.02.2026, D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J. Keywords: Wakf; Tamil Nadu Wakf Board; Waqf; Muthavalli; continuation of Muthavalli after term; pending enquiry; representation pending despite four-week direction (order dt. 20.06.2025); Ramalan/Ramzan festival; volunteer committee of eight; groupism among devotees; interim arrangement pending election; Article 226 mandamus; web-copy order; no costs. Petitioner: MasJid-E. Mubarak registered Wakf (Mohammed Unis). Counsel: V.Nithyanandam (petitioner); Rajeswari Karthikeyan, Standing Counsel (Board). No precedent engaged; no neutral citation assigned ('no grs'). Useful for interim festival-conduct directions where office-holder status is disputed.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of on terms: third respondent to constitute a committee of eight volunteers to conduct the Ramalan festival (inclusive representation from all groups, exclusion of persons with extremely controversial background, petitioner-Muthavalli preferably included); committee to maintain the traditional arrangements (breaking of fast, night prayers) of the masjid/waqf during Ramalan; authorities to act on the web-copy of the order; no order as to costs.