Jacintha Mary v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petition; Article 226; writ of Certiorarified Mandamus; Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum Puducherry; order passed without notice and opportunity of hearing; set aside and remitted for fresh consideration; speaking order after personal hearing within 8 weeks; electricity service connection disconnection and cancellation; Puducherry Electricity Department (Executive Engineer Urban O&M, Junior Engineer Mudaliarpet, Assistant Engineer Marapallam Substation); Jacintha Mary v. P. Chandrasekar; Plot Nos. 342 and 343, Re-Survey No.178/1, Murugapakkam Revenue Village, Puducherry; Reference PDY/CG/23/2025 dated 11.11.2025; connected WMP.No.56090 of 2025.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order of the 1st Respondent set aside; matter remitted to the 1st Respondent for fresh consideration with a direction to pass a speaking order after affording personal hearing to all interested parties within 8 weeks; no costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.