Dismissed¶23

Minda Capital Pvt. Ltd. v. the State Industries Promotion

Madras HC28 Jan 2026WP/4312/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, W.P. No. 4312 of 2025, Minda Capital Pvt. Ltd. v. SIPCOT (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J., 28.01.2026): Article 226 certiorarified mandamus against SIPCOT penalty (records dated 12.10.2023 of 2nd Respondent; order dated 25.10.2024 of 1st Respondent, ref. P-1/PKM/Minda Capital/78/2010) and prayer to record company name change by registered affidavit instead of Modified Lease Deed (MLD); petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; W.M.P. Nos. 4825 and 4828 of 2025 closed; no merits decision.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; no relief granted on merits; connected miscellaneous petitions (W.M.P. Nos. 4825 and 4828 of 2025) closed; no costs. ¶23

Minda Capital Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State Industries… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P. No. 4312 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 28.01.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

W.P. No. 4312 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P. Nos. 4825 and 4828 of 2025

¶8

Minda Capital Pvt. Ltd., (formerly known as Minda Capital Limited), rep. by its Director/Authorized Signatory, Mr. Ashish Jain, having its registered office at A-15, Ashok Vihar, Phase-1, New Delhi–110052. …Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), rep. by its Managing Director, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶11

The General Manager, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT), 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2^nd Respondent bearing P-1/PKM/Minda Capital/78/2010 dated 12.10.2023 and that of the 1^st Respondent in P-1/PKM/Minda Capital/78/2010 dated 25.10.2024 and quash the same in so far as the levy of penalty on the Petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the 1^st Respondent to record of the change in the name of the Petitioner Company by way of a registered affidavit instead of a Modified Lease Deed (MLD).

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P. No. 4312 of 2025

¶17

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶18

Maya

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.Muthuccharan Sundresh

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.Abishek Murthy, Standing Counsel

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶23

2.Permission is granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶24

28.01.2026

¶25

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yest/No Speaking or Non-speaking order

¶26

Maya

¶27

¶28