Dismissed¶25

R.Senthil Kumar v. the Registrar of Co-Operative Societies

Madras HC24 Jun 2026WP/4311/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras HC dismisses Article 226 certiorari petitions (WP Nos. 4311 & 17455 of 2025) against a co-operative dues demand notice dated 29.05.2024 (E.P. No.3/2024-2025 in Na.Ka. No. 1819/2023/SP) and consequential attachment notice dated 16.09.2024 issued by the Deputy Registrar, Dharapuram; dismissed as settled because petitioner R.Senthil Kumar fully settled dues of Rs.51,19154/- with interest of Rs.28,17,774/- towards the Virugalpattipudur Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society and all coercive action was dropped; no substantive adjudication of the quashing question; connected WMPs closed; no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the Writ Petitions were dismissed as settled after the petitioner paid the dues with interest and the third respondent dropped all coercive action. ¶25

R.Senthil Kumar Vs the Registrar of Co-Operative… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP Nos. 4311 and 17455 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 24-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶6

WP Nos. 4311 and 17455 of 2025 and WMP Nos.4821, 19792 & 19793 of 2025

¶7

R.Senthil Kumar S/o.Rathinasamy, No.5/ 101, Chikkanootthu, West Garden, Moongil Thozhuvu, Udumalpet Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶8

..Petitioner in both

¶9

¶10

The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai- 600 010.

¶11

The Joint Registrar of Co- Operative Societies, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.

¶12

The Deputy Registrar of Co- Operative Societies, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

¶13

The President, K.752, Virugalpattipudur Primary Agricultural Co- Operative Credit Society, Virugalpattipudur, Udumalpet Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶14

..Respondents in both

¶15

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned demand notice made in E.P. No.3/ 2024 -2025 in Na.Ka. No. 1819 /2023/ SP dated 29.05.2024 and consequential impugned attachment notice dated 16.09.2024, issued by the third respondent and to quash the same.

¶16

__________ Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP Nos. 4311 and 17455 of 2025

¶19

In both Petitions

¶20

For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Chakkaravarthy, Government Counsel

¶21

COMMON ORDER

¶22

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it was brought to the

¶23

notice of this Court that the petitioner, Mr.R.Senthil Kumar, has settled the dues of Rs.51,19154/- along with interest to the tune of Rs.28,17,774/- with the third respondent.

¶24

The learned Government counsel for the third respondent would submit that, in light of the said settlement, the third respondent has dropped all coercive action against the petitioner.

¶25