Dismissed¶25

Samudeswari v. the District Collector/Inspector of Panchayat

Madras HC29 Jun 2026WP/4274/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; WP No. 4274 of 2024; decided 29-06-2026 by Justice Hemant Chandangoudar; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn at counsel's request with endorsement; Article 226 Constitution of India; challenged order Pro. Na. Ka. No. 1470/2022/A6 U.E.(Uoo) dated 12.10.2023 of District Collector Kancheepuram; representations dated 14.07.2022, 22.10.2022, 17.10.2023 regarding Village President Poosivakkam Panchayat, Walajapath Taluk; connected WMP.Nos. 4583 to 4585 of 2024 closed; no costs; no merits adjudicated, no holdings.

What the court decided

AI extract

Samudeswari Vs the District Collector/Inspector of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 4274 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 29-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶6

WP No. 4274 of 2024

¶7

and WMP.Nos. 4583 to 4585 of 2024

¶8

Samudeswari

¶9

Amsavalli

¶10

Keerthana

¶11

R.Ramu

¶12

..Petitioner(s)

¶13

¶14

The District Collector/inspector Of Panchayat Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

¶15

The Block Development Officer (v.P) Walajapath Panchayat Union, Walajapath, Kancheepuram District.

¶16

The Village President Poosivakkam Panchayat, Walajapath Taluk, Kancheepuram District 631 601.

¶17

..Respondent(s)

¶18

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, calling for the records of the 1st respondent relating to the order in Pro. Na. Ka. No. 1470 / 2022 / A6 U.E.(Uoo) dated 12.10.2023 to quash the same and to issue consequential directions to the 1st respondent to initiate action the 3rd respondent by considering the representations dated 14.07.2022, 22.10.2022 and 17.10.2023 and pass such further or other orders.

¶19

Page1 of 3

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

WP No. 4274 of 2024

¶22

For Petitioners: Mr. P.Rajendiran For Respondents: Mr. P.Siddharth, Government Counsel.

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission from this Court to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶25

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

¶26

29-06-2026

¶27

Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶28

¶29

¶30