Dismissed¶22

M/s.East coast construction and Industries Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of labour (General)

Madras HC12 Jun 2026WP/3666/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, single judge (K. Surender, J.), 12-06-2026; W.P.No.3666 of 2023 dismissed as not pressed on counsel's endorsement in court bundle; challenged Deputy Commissioner of Labour / Controlling Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act order dated 06.10.2022 in I.A.No. 38 of 2022 in I.A. No.178 of 2021 in P.G. No. Unnumbered of 2022; certiorarified mandamus; no costs; connected W.M.P.Nos.3753 & 3754 of 2023 closed; petitioner East coast construction and Industries Limited; respondents Abdul Rahman and Deputy Commissioner of Labour; no substantive ruling — no precedential value.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/s.East coast construction and Industries Limited… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.3666 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12-06-2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER

¶6

W.P.No.3666 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.3753 & 3754 of 2023

¶7

M/s.East coast construction and Industries Limited Rep by its Authorized Signatory No.4, Moores Road, Chennai.

¶8

..Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (General) Office of the Joint Commissioner of labour- 1, Teynampet, Chennai.

¶11

Abdul Rahman S/o.Shaul Hammeed, No.105/1,6th Street, Senthil Nagar, Seevaram, Perungudi, Chennai.

¶12

..Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in connection with the order passed in I.A.No. 38 of 2022 in I.A. No.178 of 2021 in P.G. No. Unnumbered of 2022, dated 06.10.2022 passed by the 1st respondent, Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Controlling Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act, and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent to consider the I.A.No.38 of 2022 in accordance with law.

¶14

For Petitioner: K.Sudalai Kannu For Respondents: Mr.D.Chakkaravarthy Govt Counsel For R1 , Mr.S.Janarthanan For R2

¶15

¶16

Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.3666 of 2023

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the petitioner is not pressing upon the writ petition and accordingly, the same may be dismissed as not pressed. He also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.

¶21

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the

¶22

petitioner and also taking note of the endorsement made in the court bundle, this Writ Petition stands Dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶23

(K. SURENDER, J.) 12-06-2026

¶24

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶25

sts

¶26

Page2 of 4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.3666 of 2023