Mrs.S.Gnanaselvi v. the Commissioner of Revenue Administration
Case brief
What is this about?
Bare-withdrawal order, Madras High Court, single-judge bench (M. Dhandapani, J.), 09.03.2026, W.P.No.32210 of 2024. Keywords: writ of mandamus dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's endorsement; no costs; Article 226 Constitution of India; section 4(4), The T.N. Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017; registration of tenancy agreement dated 01.12.2023; Application Number TN-242024033014579; Form IV dated 08.10.2024 pending before Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram; Commissioner of Revenue Administration; District Collector, Chengalpattu District; private respondent G.Gopalakrishnan; advocates K.Pragadeesh Kumar (petitioners), V.Yamunadevi SPG-type government pleader for R1–R3, V.Chandrasekaran for R4. No holdings on the statute; no cases cited; unsuitable as precedent authority.
What did the court decide?
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs imposed.