Disposed¶25

Chandrika G v. Principal Chief Engineer (Civil)

Madras HC9 Mar 2026WP/31749/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 31749 of 2022; High Court of Judicature at Madras; decided 09-03-2026; Chandrika G vs Principal Chief Engineer (Civil) BSNL South Zone; writ of mandamus; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2022 pending; direction to consider and dispose of representation on merits in accordance with law within 8 weeks; no opinion expressed on merits; disposed of, no cost; no appearance for petitioner; Mr. T. Ravikumar, St. counsel for respondent; Krishnan Ramasamy J.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2022 and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; writ petition disposed of with no costs. ¶25

Chandrika G Vs Principal Chief Engineer (Civil) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 31749 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 31749 of 2022

¶6

Chandrika G W/o. Late. Mr. Gunasekaran, No. 27/5, Raghava Nagar Main Road, Hasthinapuram, Chrompet, Chennai 44

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

Principal Chief Engineer (Civil) BSNL South Zone, IVth Floor, 60, Ethiraj Salai, Chennai 08

¶10

Respondent(s)

¶11

PRAYER

¶12

Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to take necessary action upon the representation made by the petitioner on 25.06.2022 which is pending before the respondent

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : No appearance

¶14

For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Ravikumar, St.counsel

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2022.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 31749 of 2022

¶19

None appeared for the petitioner.

¶20

However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent would

¶21

submit that the petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2022 will be disposed of by the respondent within a period of 8 weeks.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and also

¶23

perused the entire materials available on record.

¶24

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.06.2022 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25