Disposed¶29

Rasi Seed (P) Ltd., v. The Special District Revenue Officer

Writ of Mandamus – Land acquisition compensation

Madras HC27 Mar 2026WP/30991/2022

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, WP No. 30991 of 2022, decided 27-03-2026 by Krishnan Ramasamy J. Rasi Seed (P) Ltd. v. Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition) & Project Officer, NHAI-68, Salem. Petition under Article 226 for mandamus to consider representation dated 17.08.2022 seeking 30% solatium with interest per Union of India v. Tarsem Singh (CA No.7064 of 2019). Court directed disposal of representation on merits within 12 weeks without expressing opinion on merits; petition disposed, no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 17.08.2022 on merits and in accordance with law within twelve weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs. ¶29

Rasi Seed (P) Ltd., Vs The Special District Revenue… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 30991 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 27-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 30991 of 2022

¶6

Rasi Seed (P) Ltd., Rep. by S.Kumar, Manager cum Authorized Signatory, 70/9, 10, Cuddalore Main Road, Thulukanur village, Attur Taluk, Salem District.

¶7

..Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition),

¶10

The competent Authority Land Acquisition, National Highways - 68, Room No. 414, 4th Floor, Collector office building, Salem 636001.

¶11

The Project officer, National Highways Authority of India 68 , Salem.

¶12

..Respondent(s)

¶13

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to disburse the statutory entitlement namely 30% solatium with interest till the day of payment, in the light of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Union of India and Another Vs. Tarsem Singh and others, in Civil Appeal No.7064 of 2019, by considering petitioner’s representation dated 17.08.2022.

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.K.Sudhakar For Respondent(s) : Mrs.S.Indhu Bala, AGP for R1

¶15

Page1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP No. 30991 of 2022

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition is filed to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 17.08.2022.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 17.08.2022 to disburse the statutory entitlement namely 30% solatium with interest till the day of payment, in the light judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Union of India and another Vs., Tarsem Singh and others, in Civil Appeal No.7064 of 2019. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶21

Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation dated 17.08.2022 will be considered within a period of 12 weeks.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶23

Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated

¶24

Page2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP No. 30991 of 2022

¶27

17.08.2022, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve

¶28

(12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No