Disposed¶33

C.Banumathi v. the Director General of Police

Madras HC9 Jan 2026WP/282/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras HC, WP 282/2026, disposed 09-01-2026, single judge V. Lakshminarayanan. Article 226 mandamus by C.Banumathi for release of vehicle TN 11 BF 1552 (Sri Aishwarya Enterprises) held by Chengalpattu police after accident of 13.11.2025; no valid insurance at accident time noted by Government Advocate Meganathan; Court ruled insurance matters not probeable in writ petition; Brake Inspector's test and investigation to finish in three weeks; vehicle to go to jurisdictional Magistrate's custody; petitioner to seek return from Magistrate Court; no costs.

What did the court decide?

No immediate release ordered; the petitioner was directed to apply to the jurisdictional Magistrate Court for return of the vehicle once it is produced there after completion of the investigation (stated to be within three weeks). ¶33

C.Banumathi Vs the Director General of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should forthwith release and return the vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 11 BF 1552, belonging to Sri Aishwarya Enterprises, to the petitioner. +1 more

¶16

Court's answer

The Court recorded the Government Advocate's statement that the vehicle will be produced for the Brake Inspector's test, that the investigation will be completed within three weeks, and that the vehicle will then be handed over to the custody of the jurisdictional Magistrate Court.

¶29

Ratio / Principle

Once the vehicle is sent to the jurisdictional Magistrate Court, the petitioner can move that Court for return of the vehicle.

¶29

Key takeaways

Matters concerning the absence of valid insurance at the time of the accident are not matters which can be probed into by this Court in a writ petition.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (single judge: V. Lakshminarayanan), WP No. 282 of 2026, disposed of on 09-01-2026. Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by petitioner C.Banumathi seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the Director General of Police (Chennai), Superintendent of Police (Chengalpattu) and Sub-Inspector of Police (Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station) to forthwith release and return vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 11 BF 1552 belonging to Sri Aishwarya Enterprises. Petitioner's counsel (R.Bhagath Singh representing R.Krishnasamy) had handed over the driver's (Mr.Vinoth Kumar.R) driving licence, the vehicle's insurance policy and the Registration Certificate. The Government Advocate (Meganathan) stated there was no valid insurance at the time of the accident on 13.11.2025; the Court observed these are not matters which can be probed into in a writ petition. Recording the Government Advocate's undertaking that the vehicle would be produced for the Brake Inspector's test and the investigation completed within three weeks, after which the vehicle would be handed over to the custody of the jurisdictional Magistrate Court, the Court stated the petitioner could then move that Court for return of the vehicle. Writ petition disposed of; no costs.

¶1

2026:MHC:184

¶2

WP No. 282 of 2026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 09-01-2026

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶7

WP No. 282 of 2026

C.Banumathi

Petitioner(s)

1.The Director General of Police No.601, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

¶12

2.The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police, Chengalpattu-603 002.

¶13

3.The Sub-Inspector of Police Chengalpattu Taluk Police Station, Chengalpattu -603 001.

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

PRAYER

¶16

Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to forthwith release and return the vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 11 BF 1552 belonging to Sri Aishwarya Enterprises

¶17

For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Bhagathsingh For Respondent(s): Mr.Meganatham Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶18

Page 1 of 4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

WP No. 282 of 2026

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Mr.R.Bhagath Singh, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Krishnasamy for

¶23

the petitioner, states that he has handed over the following documents for the vehicle bearing registration No.TN 11 BF 1552:

¶24

(i) the driving license of the driver, Mr.Vinoth Kumar.R;

¶25

(ii) Insurance policy of the vehicle, and;

¶26

(iii) the Registration Certificate (RC).

¶27

Mr.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶28

appearing on behalf of the respondents, states that at the time of the accident on 13.11.2025, there was no valid insurance. These are not matters which can be probed into by this Court in a writ petition.

¶29

Mr.Meganthan further states that the vehicle will be produced for Brake Inspector’s test, and the investigation will be completed within three weeks, and the vehicle will then be handed over to the custody of the jurisdictional Magistrate Court. His statement is recorded. Once the vehicle is sent to the jurisdictional Magistrate Court, as stated, the petitioner can move the said Court for return of the vehicle.

¶30

Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WP No. 282 of 2026

¶33