Dismissed¶26

K.Vinoth v. The District Registrar (Admin)

Madras HC28 Apr 2026WP/27983/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; connected WMP No. 27278 of 2022 closed; Madras High Court single Judge Krishnan Ramasamy J.; Article 226 Constitution of India; Certiorarified Mandamus; notice Na.Ka. /6234 dated 07.09.2022; District Registrar (Admin) Ariyalur; Sub-Registrar Irumbulikkurichi; cancellation of sale deed Document No.1121/2019; pending suit OS No.610/2019 District Munsif Court Sendurai; petitioner K.Vinoth; advocate Ms.K.Priyavarshini; Mr.P.Harish Government Advocate for R1 and R2; no appearance for R3 (Saroja); endorsement in case bundle.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶26

K.Vinoth Vs The District Registrar (Admin) — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and connected miscellaneous petition closed.

¶26

Issue for consideration

Whether the notice in Na.Ka. /6234 dated 07.09.2022 issued by the first respondent should be quashed, and whether the first respondent should forbear from conducting enquiry into the cancellation of sale deed Document No.1121/2019 until disposal of OS No.610/2019 (raised by the prayer clause; not adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn).

¶15

Ratio / Principle

Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

¶23

Key takeaways

Considering the submission coupled with the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.ratio¶26

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (Krishnan Ramasamy J.), WP No. 27983 of 2022 with WMP No. 27278 of 2022, order dated 28-04-2026: Petitioner K.Vinoth had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the District Registrar (Admin), Ariyalur, quash the notice in Na.Ka. /6234 dated 07.09.2022, and forbear the first respondent from conducting enquiry into the cancellation of sale deed Document No.1121/2019 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Irumbulikkurichi, until disposal of OS No.610/2019 before the District Munsif Court, Sendurai, Ariyalur District. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. The Court accordingly dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, awarded no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. The merits of the challenged notice and the cancellation enquiry were not adjudicated.

¶1

WP No. 27983 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 28-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

WP No. 27983 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 27278 OF 2022

¶7

K.Vinoth

¶8

s/o.Kolanji, Irumbulikkurichi and Post, Sendurai Taluk, Ariyalur District.

¶9

..Petitioner(s)

¶10

¶11

The District Registrar (Admin) Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

¶12

The Sub-Registrar of Registration Irumbulikkurichi and post, sendurai taluk, Ariyalur district.

¶13

Saroja w/o.Sampath, No.2/64, South Street, Irumbulikkurichi and post, sendurai taluk, ariyalur district.

¶14

..Respondent(s)

¶15

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the record of the 1st respondent pertaining to the notice in Na.Ka. /6234 dated 07.09.2022 and quash the same and consequently forbear the first respondent from conducting enquiry with reference to the cancellation of sale deed in Document No.1121/2019 on the file of the 2nd respondent till the disposal of the suit in OS No.610/2019 on the file of District Munsif Court, Sendurai, Ariyalur District

¶16

For Petitioner(s): Ms.K.Priyavarshini

¶17

Page1 of 3

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No. 27983 of 2022

¶20

For Respondent(s):

¶21

Mr.P.Harish, Government Advocate for R1 and R2 No appearance for R3

¶22

Order

¶23

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

¶24

He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

¶25

Considering the submission coupled with an endorsement made by the

¶26

learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶27

28-04-2026

¶28

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶29

¶30

¶31