S.Arivarasan v. The Additional secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras HC dismisses PIL-styled writ petition WP 26056/2026 (14.07.2026, Dharmadhikari CJ authoring; Arul Murugan J.) seeking resumption of lands under D.K.T.No.956/32 dt. 10.2.1923, restoration to Government and reassignment to heirs of Adi Dravidar/Scheduled Caste assignees; relief barred by subsisting purchaser decrees (OS 263/77, 267/77, 268/77 decreed; Government appeals A.S. 204/1979, 205/1979, 206/2079 dismissed); petition held misconceived; no costs.
What did the court decide?
In view of the decree already existing in favour of the purchasers from the original beneficiaries, the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted; the writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. ¶36