Allowed
Charles Anitha (Athulya) v. The Deputy State Tax Officer I
Madras HCWP/25132/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
High Court set aside an impugned GST demand order and its consequential rectification order for alleged breach of natural justice, remanding the matter for reconsideration after filing充足的 appeal proceedings: assessee agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days as a condition for the order to be set aside and for the authority to issue a fresh order within three months of remittance
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dated 17.12.2025 and consequential rectification order dated 30.03.2026 set aside if petitioner remits 25% of disputed tax demand within 30 days; matter remanded for reconsideration.